About wtaylorf

From P-Town to T-Town

The Machine: A University of Alabama Mainstay

            The University of Alabama has had a long and storied history. Many aspects, such as football and academic programs, have been positive. But there are many troubling areas in the story of the University. One of the most obvious is the University’s failure to integrate until federal interference forced the issue in the 1960s. But one of the most important influences on the University’s history is “The Machine,” a coalition of twenty-seven all-white fraternities and sororities. Although some question its existence, it has essentially run University politics for nearly a century. Although some may see this as a negative part of the University’s history, it is much more than that on campus. In fact, it could be viewed as a microcosm of the American government system. From its very beginnings as a rogue chapter of Theta Nu Epsilon to today, The Machine has caused controversy.

            Although there are rumors that it formed as early as 1888, Theta Nu Epsilon, Alpha-Rho chapter was formally established as an inter-fraternity organization at The University of Alabama in 1902 and officially recognized by the University in 1905. At that time, T.N.E. had sixteen members, all from ΣΑΕ, ΦΔΘ, ΑΤΩ, or ΔΚΕ (“Theta Nu Epsilon Composite, 1905” The Corolla). For the majority of its early existence, T.N.E. did not have any ties to any sort of secretive political machine. In fact, The Crimson White covered its initiation in a 1905 article titled “T.N.E. Dance.” In the article, the author referred to T.N.E.’s members as “some of the most popular men in college” (“T.N.E. Dance”).

            On February 14, 1909, a parallel organization was formed at the University called “The Skulls”. Unlike T.N.E., whose membership was comprised of sophomores, The Skulls was a senior class society (thetanuepsilon.org). However, like T.N.E., The Skulls was public with its operations. In both 1912 and 1913, The Crimson White wrote articles detailing whom the fraternity was initiating. Despite the membership differences between The Skulls and the T.N.E. national organization, they remained formally associated. There is no evidence that would connect this organization’s activities with those of The Machine until March 18, 1913. On that day, The Crimson White published an article detailing the initiation rituals of The Skulls. These rituals included a public parade (or “Pee-Rade” as it was referred to) that was meant to humiliate the new members. The new members disguised themselves as female “negroes” and paraded down the streets of Tuscaloosa in pajamas and brightly colored clothes. There were other parts of the ritual that were meant to degrade African-Americans (“The Skulls Initiate and Provide Much Fun for a Brilliant Audience”). This type of activity reflected the culture of the day and lives on the modern day Machine’s mantra as a coalition of fraternities and sororities whose membership is white-only.

            In 1914, as The Skulls became less and less like the T.N.E. national organization, The Skulls were told that they were no longer welcome as T.N.E. national members. This caused a massive confusion amongst the members of The Skulls. In the pandemonium, J. Lister Hill, a member of ΔΚΕ, took control of the fraternity and reorganized it into an organization that would control campus politics (“The Skulls Composite, 1913” The Corolla). Using his new creation, he was able to make himself the first Student Government Association president at The University of Alabama (thetanuepsilon.org). After graduation, Hill pursued a career in politics, becoming a six term Democratic U.S. Senator for the state of Alabama (bioguide.congress.gov).

            Although Hill was the first SGA President, fraternity men had held many leadership positions on campus since the early 1890’s. By 1914, over ninety-three percent of leading offices in student organizations were held by men in fraternities. Many people in the non-Greek community were troubled by this reality. In a 1913 attempt to correct this, Phi Gamma Delta’s traveling secretary (referred to only as “Mr. Chambers”) suggested that these non-fraternity men form fraternities of their own (“Non-Fraternity and Frat Men Hold Joint Meeting and Discuss Live Issues”). Although there is no concrete evidence of this, it is fair to assume that this is where the division between Machine and non-Machine fraternities began. As the new fraternities were established, the Machine fraternities became more traditional while non-Machine fraternities appealed to a more varied group of people.  This distinction may not be the case today, however, during the early days of The Machine, it likely held true.

            The Skulls operated under the format that Hill set up in 1914 until 1922, when they disappeared from public view. This disappearance was short-lived. After the 1927 SGA elections, serious accusations about “a political machine” surfaced. Although there were always whispers about fraternity men running organizations on campus, formal allegations against the SGA were never made. An open letter from William J. Cabaniss (a chair of a committee working to expose The Machine) to the University student body was posted on the front page of The Crimson White on March 29, 1928. In the letter he states, “We desire to call your attention to a situation which we regard as a serious menace… to the social and academic life of the University… there exists or has existed a secret national political fraternity on the campus” (Cabaniss 1,8). This letter was written just before the 1928 SGA elections and was directed at Machine-backed SGA president Albert Boutwell (welcometothemachine.info). Boutwell responded to the letter with a letter of his own, posted in the same article. Although he admitted to being a member of T.N.E., he denied any “oath to support each candidate”. He also attacked Cabaniss, who was a political rival of his: “he tries to justify his defeat by belittling the one who defeated him… it is best that that man [Cabaniss] was defeated” (Boutwell 1,8). Despite the seriousness of these letters, there was not another article written about T.N.E., The Skulls, or The Machine in The Crimson White until the 1940s. Boutwell went on to become powerful in Alabama state politics.

            Cabaniss may have had a good point. Up until that time, every SGA President had been Machine-backed. Since that time, less than seven percent of the SGA Presidents have won the vote without Machine backing (welcometothemachine.info). The impact of this statistic  becomes even more evident considering only about fourteen percent of all students at The University of Alabama are actives in Machine fraternities and sororities as of Spring, 2012 (greekaffairs.ua.edu) (ua.edu).

            During the middle of the twentieth century, anti-Machine sentiment began to grow. This sentiment was strongly represented in the offices of The Crimson White. In recent years, The CW has had a reputation of being anti-Greek. This bias can be noted as early as 1949 in an article written just before SGA election season. Although the entire article focuses on the negative aspects of The Machine, the writer’s true thoughts are best stated in the last two sentences: “Certainly no organization is more interested in improving student government than this newspaper. For that reason, The Crimson-White, carrying out its “preview” promises, will next week carry its plan for an open and above-board two party system on the campus” (“The Machine and Its Cranks”).

            A “two party system” would probably be fairer than a one party system. However, would it really be better? After all, arguably the most peaceful and prosperous time in American history was “The Era of Good Feelings;” a period of time where there was only one prominent political party, the Democratic-Republicans. For over twenty years, this party controlled all branches of the federal government and there was little opposition from the general public. International incidents were few, and for the most part, only involved Native Americans (ushistory.org). Groups such as African-Americans and women did experience cultural prejudice, but for the most part, their oppression did not result from the rule of the Democratic-Republicans. Rather, it was a result of cultural traditions and unfair laws and regulations laid down by founding fathers in a bipartisan manner. Although Machine politics are on a much smaller scale, the principle of peace in a “one party system” cannot be overlooked.

            Anti-Machine sentiment continued to grow during the 1960s. The Machine became known as a thirty-member organization that was the “puppet master” of over 7,000 students. The “puppet master” idea was reflected in a political cartoon published in The Crimson White in March of 1961. The cartoon depicts an evil-looking puppet master controlling the motions of students on campus (“Group of 30”). During the 1960s, two non-Machine backed SGA presidents were elected to office.

            Even though the decade with the least Machine domination was the 1960s, The Machine’s greatest defeat came in 1976 with the election of Cleo Thomas to the office of SGA President. Not only was Thomas not Machine-backed, but he was African-American. Thomas was able to rally African-American students, non-Greek students, and, most importantly, the mass majority of sorority girls on campus to vote for him as a vote to take down The Machine. Many sorority girls from both Machine and non-Machine sororities wanted to have more influence regarding which candidates The Machine backed in elections. To date, Thomas is the only African-American SGA President. Although Thomas was more than qualified for the position (he studied at Oxford and Harvard Law School after graduating from Alabama), his election enraged many members of the Greek community.  The long-term effect is that Machine sorority representatives have a greater influence regarding which candidate The Machine will back (tuscaloosanews.com).

            When the election results were announced, a group of 15 students emerged from the Kappa Sigma house wearing white cloaks and hoods (similar to gear worn by the Ku Klux Klan). After walking down University Avenue singing “We Shall Overcome,” the group, comprised of members of Kappa Sigma and Lambda Chi Alpha, walked to the Kappa Kappa Gamma sorority house and burned an eight-foot cross on their front lawn, another ritual synonymous with the KKK. Although no concrete evidence was ever presented to support rumors that The Machine was directly behind these terroristic demonstrations, the circumstantial evidence was overwhelming. African-American Association President Sylvester Wilson was clear in who he thought was behind the acts: “I’m sure that what happened involves Cleo [Thomas]… The Machine is upset” (Whiting).

            There is no excuse for the actions of these fraternity men. In fact, many of the operations of The Machine during the heart of the twentieth century were shady at best. But from a political perspective, the workings of The Machine can be seen as a microcosm of American politics.

            Up until the 2008 U.S. Presidential election, no African-American had ever held the position of Commander in Chief. From its creation in 1914 until 1976, no African-American was elected president of the SGA. In the current system in place in the U.S., a small group of people (the highest ranking Democrats and Republicans) selects a small, exclusive handful of candidates that have a chance at winning the Presidency out of a potential candidate pool of hundreds of millions of people. This is very similar to The Machine: a group of about 30 individuals select one person out of a pool of a few thousand eligible people that will likely become the SGA President.

            The most glaring similarity between The Machine and the U.S. political system is the number of U.S. Presidents that were members of Fraternities. All of the U.S. Presidents and Vice Presidents (except for two in each office) that were born after the first social fraternity was founded (1825) were members of fraternities (indiana.edu). What makes this fact even more astounding is that only approximately two percent of the general population of the U.S. is fraternity men (fit.edu). This is similar to the statistic of the ninety-three percent of Alabama SGA Presidents that were Machine-backed. Although it may not always be totally fair, America’s political system has been mostly positive.

            For over a decade after the incident with Cleo Thomas, The Machine ran campus politics in a relatively quiet manner. There was occasional opposition from The Crimson White amongst other groups, but no monumental issues. Knowledge about The Machine was still confined to Alabama and was not a national issue. That changed in April 1992.

            In that month’s issue of Esquire magazine, Phillip Weiss wrote an article detailing Greek life at Alabama; and in particular, The Machine fraternities and sororities. Weiss also focused on the racism involved in the social fraternities and sororities (they were segregated until Lambda Sigma Phi initiated an African-American in 2000). One incident that he sited involved two Kappa Delta (sorority) pledges who went to a costume party dressed as pregnant African-American women. A photo of the two girls was leaked and there was a tremendous outcry from the African-American community. Chad Green, a Delta Tau Delta brother, was upset, but not that the incident had happened.  He was angry that the issue became public: “it went public and everything got blown out of proportion.” During his interview with Weiss, Green was asked about The Machine, to which he responded, “I’d rather not comment on that… I just won’t comment.” Green was widely believed to be Delta’s representative for The Machine.

            The Machine at this point held eighty percent of Senate seats in the SGA. Weiss illustrated this domination when he wrote about an SGA meeting he was invited to observe. A group of non-Greeks submitted a bill to create a Fantasy Games Club. The club had an unlikely chance of getting chartered from the start. Its chances dwindled to none when the senators read the anti-Greek jokes in the club’s literature. One example was, “Do not molest the sorority girls. They have sharp nails.” This spawned an onslaught of hatred from the senators towards the non-Greeks who proposed it.

            One of the main focuses of Weiss’s article was integration. He talked discussed integration with members of Kappa Alpha Order, a historically “old-money,” southerner-only fraternity. Boo Haughton, the president of K.A. at the time, said that though he was not against integration within his fraternity, he “[did not] see it in the next five years.” He went on to detail the specifics of what he would be looking for in a potential African-American member: “Someone who appreciates southern heritage… with the same view I have, that there’s niggers and there’s blacks and there’s rednecks and white people.” Mainly, Haughton was against forced integration, which the University had been encouraging. He said that if the University forced integration, “there would be so many hazing violations out of hatred” (Weiss 102-106).

            Integration is still a hot topic today. Former University President Guy Bailey said in an October 2012 interview (less than a week after Fall 2012 pledging was cancelled) that he “would like to see the integration of the fraternities and sororities” (Flanagan). A few weeks after making these statements, Bailey stepped down as President, citing his wife’s health. However, the timing of it brought on rumors of Machine involvement. In the comments section of a news post on the blog totalfratmove.com regarding the end of pledging for the fall of 2012, a user wrote, “The Machine lives forever, there will be [repercussions]” (totalfratmove.com).

            The Machine faced even more scrutiny because of an incident during the 1993 SGA elections. Minda Riley, a sister of Phi Mu, was running for SGA president without Machine support. Normally, The Machine would not have noticed her. But because she was a member of a Machine sorority, they interpreted her run for president as an act of insubordination. When she returned to the University after Thanksgiving break in 1992, she found an “X” burned into her lawn with threatening notes written on her door. All of the notes had a central message: do not run against The Machine. Despite the threats, she ran anyways (Yardley). On the night of January 31, 1993, a masked man in Riley’s apartment assaulted her. While beating and cutting her, the assailant yelled, “You fuck with the wrong people, you get fucked.” Ironically, Riley’s brother was the Machine-backed SGA president during his time at the University. Riley’s opponent, Neil Duthie, said, “It’s really horrible it happened,” but maintained that neither he nor The Machine was involved, despite the overwhelming evidence (Travis).

            The growing negative publicity and the Riley assault led to the shutdown of the SGA. The reaction across the student body was mixed, mostly with non-Greeks in favor of the shutdown and Greeks against it. Angela Washington, a non-Greek, said “It’s probably the best thing right now.” The president of the SGA at the time of the shutdown, Mark Bain, was much more negative and highly doubted the future of student government at Alabama: “Without a doubt we are the last of what we know as the Student Government Association” (Stoker).

            Bain’s prediction regarding the future of the SGA was wrong. In 1996, students adopted a new constitution for the SGA that supposedly eliminated voting blocs. There was still doubt as to whether or not this would work, since The Machine’s influence was so entrenched (Gose). Obviously, The Machine’s power is still a force to recon with as every single SGA president since 1996 has been Machine-backed (welcometothemachine.info).

            The incidents in the early 1990s and the Thomas election in 1976 show The Machine at its worst: a terrorist organization. Violence should never be in politics, let alone student government. The shutdown of the SGA was necessary because of Riley’s assault, even if it was not very effective. If it had not been shutdown, it would appear that the University condoned these violent actions.

            Since the reinstatement of the SGA, The Machine has been relatively quiet. Although there have been many Crimson White articles about it, it has not been a violent force on campus. However, it still holds control over SGA presidential elections, considering there has not been a non-Machine backed president since 1987. Another example of its presence on today’s campus is block seating at football games. Machine fraternities make up seven of the top ten blocks in the 2012 block seating chart. Although there are less Machine fraternities in top spots than previous years, it is clear that they still dominate the front rows (Brown 1,5).

            As is true with every secret political organization, there are dark aspects to The Machine. During these dark times, The Machine transformed from a group of people with a common goal to a group of people only out for themselves. Since the reformation of the SGA in 1996, The Machine has become slightly less powerful than it was in the earlier part of the twentieth century. However, it still holds a great deal of influence over the University leadership, possibly playing a role in President Bailey’s departure from the University. Regardless of whether Lister Hill’s creation is one of good or evil, The Machine’s existence had a huge impact on student life at Alabama.



Works Cited

“The Alpha Rho Chapter at The University of Alabama.” Theta Nu Epsilon Society – History of the Alabama Chapter. Web. 13 Nov. 2012. <http://thetanuepsilon.org/13Chaplis/Indivpages/Alabama.html&gt;.

Bacon. “University of Alabama Suspends ALL Fraternity Pledgeships For the Rest of the Year | TFM News.” TotalFratMove.com. 19 Oct. 2012. Web. 17 Nov. 2012. <http://totalfratmove.com/1064709&gt;.

Brown, Melissa. “Map Changes With Process.” The Crimson White 10 Sept. 2012: 1+. Print.

Cabaniss, William J., and Albert Boutwell. “To The Student Body.” The Crimson White 29 Mar. 1928: 1+. Print.

Caffey, W. M., ed. The Corolla. 1905. Print.

“The Era of Good Feelings and the Two-Party System.” U.S. History. Web. 13 Nov. 2012. <http://www.ushistory.org/us/23a.asp&gt;.

Flanagan, Ben. “UA President Wants to See Racial Integration in Fraternities, Sororities.” Al.com. 24 Oct. 2012. Web. 17 Nov. 2012. <http://blog.al.com/tuscaloosa/2012/10/ua_president_wants_to_see_raci.html&gt;.

“GO GREEK!!!” Florida Institute of Technology. Web. 13 Nov. 2012. <http://www.fit.edu/greeklife/how_to_join.php&gt;.

Gose, Ben. “U. of Alabama Tries to Deter Bloc Voting in Campus Elections.” U. of Alabama Tries to Deter Bloc Voting in Campus Elections. 11 Oct. 1996. Web. 17 Nov. 2012. <http://chronicle.com/article/U-of-Alabama-Tries-to-Deter/75042/&gt;.

“Greek Affairs Chapter Report Spring 2012.” Greek Affairs – The University of Alabama. Office of the University Registrar, 6 June 2012. Web. 12 Nov. 2012. <http://greekaffairs.ua.edu/documents/Spring2012GradeReport-WEB.pdf&gt;.

“Greek Life at Indiana University.” Indiana University. 2009. Web. 12 Nov. 2012. <http://www.indiana.edu/~gogreek/IFCbooklet.pdf&gt;.

“Group of 30.” Cartoon. The Crimson White. Print.Published 21 March 1961

“Growing With Quality.” The University of Alabama. Web. 13 Nov. 2012. <http://www.ua.edu/features/enrollment.html&gt;.

“HILL, Joseph Lister.” HILL, Joseph Lister – Biographical Information. Web. 13 Nov. 2012. <http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=h000598&gt;.

Jones, Adam. “Time Out with Cleo Thomas.” Tuscaloosa News. 22 Nov. 2006. Web. 13 Nov. 2012. <http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061122/TMAG07/61120011&gt;.

“The Machine and Its Cranks.” The Crimson White 26 Jan. 1949. Print.

“Non-Fraternity and Frat Men Hold Joint Meeting and Discuss Live Issues.” The Crimson White 15 Apr. 1913. Print.

Richardson, W. M., Jr., ed. The Corolla. 1913. Print.

“The Skulls Initiate and Provide Much Fun for a Brilliant Audience.” The Crimson White 18 Mar. 1913. Print.

Stoker, Kevin. “UA Students Ponder Government Shutdown.” Mobile Register 6 Feb. 1993. Print.

“T.N.E. Dance.” The Crimson White 7 Mar. 1905. Print.

Travis, Scott. “Riley Assaulted by Masked Intruder.” The Crimson White 1 Feb. 1993. Print.

“University of Alabama SGA Presidents.” Welcome to the Machine :: University of Alabama SGA Presidents. Web. 13 Nov. 2012. <http://www.welcometothemachine.info/media.php?ID=131&gt;.

Weiss, Philip. “The Most Powerful Fraternity in America.” Esquire Apr. 1992: 102-06. Web.

Whiting, Chuck. “Crosses Burned After Election.” The Crimson White 10 Feb. 1976. Print.

Yardley, Jim. “Messing With the Campus Machine.” The Atlanta Journal-Constitution 7 Dec. 1992. Print.


Final Reflection: Turbulent, yet Successful

           This semester has been an interesting one for me, both academically and socially. The transition from the high school style of writing to the collegiate style has been smooth both in my writing process and overall attitude. Although I have been successful in some areas, I still have a lot of room to improve as a writer. One thing that has not changed since the beginning of the semester: I still consider myself to be a writer.

            My writing process in high school was simple: go to my basement, turn on generic pop music, and try not to get too distracted by Facebook and Twitter. With the exception of the location, my process is identical. Right now, I am writing this paper at my desk in my dorm room while listening to the “Today’s Pop Hits” playlist on Songza with Facebook open. I still take occasional breaks to venture out of my room to hang out with my suitemates. One thing that has changed is that I rarely write papers late at night anymore. I believe that my writing quality has improved because of this. When I write during the day, I am more focused and creative and it shows in my writing.

            Before this class, the majority of the papers I wrote were not enjoyable to me. With the exception of some creative pieces, I was writing for the sole purpose of turning in a paper. This attitude has definitely changed with this class, especially with project four. While writing my paper about The Machine, I became engaged in my research and truly enjoyed writing about this pseudo-secret society. Even while writing my other papers for this class, I found myself more interested in what I was writing. Hopefully, I can maintain this attitude towards writing in my future classes.

            At the beginning of the semester, I set three goals for myself: stop procrastinating, keep up with my assignments, and write more efficiently. I definitely succeeded with my first goal, although it took a while. At the beginning of the semester, I did procrastinate until the last minute like had I had with every other paper I had ever written. However, as the semester went on, I started papers earlier and earlier. Because of this, I was less stressed and I believe that my writing improved. Accomplishing this makes me feel very proud since this is something I have been struggling with my entire life.

            Unfortunately, I cannot say the same for my second goal. During October, I missed a few assignments in several of my classes. Although a large part of this can be attributed to non-academic distractions that I faced, I still should have had the mind to write down my assignments in a planner. Although it is disappointing to me that I could not accomplish this goal, I know I can still improve in this area in the coming years.

            I had mixed results with my last goal. Although I feel like I was able to write more quickly, Facebook and Twitter still consistently distract me amongst other things. However, I do not believe that it had a tremendously negative effect on my writing, so I am not as disappointed with myself as I am with my second goal.

            I absolutely still consider myself to be a writer and an author. When I write something, I try to write it with a purpose. This purpose is what makes someone an author. Therefore, as long as everyone has a purpose to their writing, everyone is an author.

            As a whole, this semester has been incredibly beneficial to me as a writer. Small changes to my writing process and attitude have improved the overall quality of my work. Although I did not reach all of my goals, I know that I still have time to reach them in the coming semesters. My belief that everyone can be an author has been solidified after taking this class. Overall, my semester in this class has been a tremendously positive experience.

Review 2

Another presentation I enjoyed was Phillip’s about Saban being worth it. I am a die-hard Alabama fan and have been my entire life. Because of this, my gut answer to this question was, “HELL YES.”

And it still is. But it is very interesting that the football program loses money from going to the BCS National Championship, despite the payout being $17,000,000. A reason for this is probably because that $17 million goes directly to the SEC for redistribution. In other words, Alabama will still get a lot of money, but it has to share it with schools like Mississippi State and Kentucky.

Phillip also mentioned Mike Shula and his coaching regime. As an Alabama fan during that time, I can affirm that it was hellish. During his one respectable season, he still lost to LSU and Auburn. Saban coming in after him was a huge blessing.

Review 1

One presentation that I enjoyed was Matt’s about the history of Tuscaloosa pre-1831. I found it very interesting that information was so hard to find. It was also good that despite that, he was able to put together a very nice website.

I enjoy learning about history (especially American history) very much. That is another reason that this presentation was interesting to me. Unfortunately, the brutality described on his website is par-for-the-course as far as American history goes. What happened to Chief Tuscaloosa and the remaining Native Americans was just a precursor to what was going to happen through the 19th century.

A final thing that I found cool is that I learned that Tuscaloosa’s history with regards to settlers is comparable to my hometown’s: Rochester, NY. Tuscaloosa was a port city along the Black Warrior River. Rochester, though it was somewhat of a port city along the Genesee River, truly became a port city with the construction of the Erie Canal and its population boomed.

Library Research Response

The video about Scout was nothing really new to me.  In high school, I had used very similar researching data bases.  One thing that was new that I did like was the “Relevancy” meter.  I feel like this could be a very helpful and time conserving feature.  I don’t really have any questions with regards to Scout.  It seems very straight forward.

The podcasts weren’t super interesting.  The first one (regarding the information cycle) gave me no real new information.  Although I had never heard the term “information cycle”, the cycle itself was not foreign.  The definition of a library was intriguing because I never thought of a library as a collection of knowledge.  I did already know that librarians need a special degree, although I still have no clue why.  In high school, our librarians were some of the meanest people alive, so I never really talked to them.  I have done legitimate research papers in high school and because of this I didn’t get a whole lot out of the third podcast about the process of writing the research question and starting my paper.  Again, it is hard for me to buy into the idea of a “helpful librarian” with my experience in high school.  I think it is obvious not to use a random blog as a source for a research paper.  Because of this, the fourth podcast was also somewhat redundant.  I think this will differ from previous research projects in the sense that it has a local focus.  I had never done a research paper focused on Rochester or Pittsford, so focusing on the University will be a new experience in that regard.

Chapter Responses

Most of the information from chapter twenty-two I had already learned in high school.  However, one thing I never really learned about was paraphrasing.  Although I do it all the time, I never understood that there are right and wrong ways to do it.  The argument for the correct paraphrasing in the book makes perfect sense and I understand why not to just replace or rearrange words.

The twenty-seventh chapter was somewhat confusing to me.  To me, it seemed like it was only talking about the difference between formal and informal writing, which is fairly simple.  For me, it is easy to switch between “texting language” and formal language.  I completely understand that I cannot write “haha” or “wassup” in a paper that I will turn in for a grade.

I thought the twenty-eighth chapter made a good point.  Academic writing is very different from any other writing that we do.  For example, if I am writing something for a school newspaper piece or for a blog (such as this), I will use different words and sentence structures.  However, there are similarities.  An example would be that you must choose evidence that is credible to your audience.